More and more I ‘ve come to believe that we can find some of the sharpest social criticism in the sometimes vulgar, lowbrow, comedy of Family Guy. In one scene there is a “cut away” to an anti-war activist shouting, “We need to ban nuclear arms. You can’t hug your children with nuclear arms.” The intent is to highlight the sometimes-overwrought cliché that are attached to social and political protest. As a self-proclaimed “Christian pacifist” I admit that even I found it funny to laugh as such a “corny” statement regardless of the political sentiment.
While reading the news and following updates on President Trump’s attacks on Syria I expected to read and hear a lot of familiar cliché. I expected my daily diet of left-wing commentators to shout things like “food not bombs” and “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” I agree with these statements but they are used so much their meaning seems stale and a bit useless.
While reading one of my favorite commentators I saw the often-used left-wing cliché “budgets are moral documents.” This commentator was speaking of the government’s budget that included sharp increases on military spending with sharp decreases in social welfare spending. The cliché here is that we can understand the morality of our elected officials by seeing which programs they choose to fund and which programs they cut. While I’ve read, and probably have used, this cliché a thousand times it stuck with me as I thought about the missile attacks on Syria.
Journalist Will Bunch made a point in his column on the “differences in priorities” that the U.S. government was taking with its policy on Syria. Bunch noticed that
“Two numbers really stand out regarding the Syrian missile strike. The first is 105- the number of cruise missiles fired at Syrian targets Friday night, an arsenal that has a cost of roughly $200 million dollars. The other number is 11- the grand total of Syrian refugees that America has accepted so far in 2018. In other words, the number of missiles we fired into Syria because of our concerns for their suffering people is nearly 10 times the number of people we’re willing to offer safe harbor in the United States.”
I believe that Bunch has found the truth that is buried in the often-used cliché. We see the morality of our leaders in the policy decisions they have made.
The context of all this and how we think of policy prescriptions should be centered in scripture. I thought of the verse in First Chronicles 29:14, where King David is thanking God for choosing to save his people from their misery and injustice. King David is so thankful that God has extended his mercy on his people that he observes, ““For all things come from you, and of your own we have given you. For we are aliens and pilgrims before you, as were all our fathers; our days on earth are as a shadow, and without hope.” I know that things are dark for the people of Syria right now. But as a Christians we are nothing if we don’t become like little children and surrender ourselves to “hope.” My hope is that as Christians we will push our decision makers to take a holistic approach to this problem and embrace solutions that promote life. I pray that Christians across the world bear witness to hope and help our Syrian brothers and sisters.